Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data?

Lechner, A, Langford, W, Bekessy, S and Jones, S 2012, 'Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data?', Landscape Ecology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1249-1261.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006038753.pdf Accepted Manuscript application/pdf 888.56KB
Title Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data?
Author(s) Lechner, A
Langford, W
Bekessy, S
Jones, S
Year 2012
Journal name Landscape Ecology
Volume number 27
Issue number 9
Start page 1249
End page 1261
Total pages 13
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Abstract In this quantitative review, we investigate the degree to which landscape ecology studies that use spatial data address spatial uncertainty when conducting analyses. We identify three broad categories of spatial uncertainty that are important in determining the characterisation of landscape pattern and affect the outcome of analysis in landscape ecology: (i) classification scheme uncertainty, (ii) spatial scale and (iii) classification error. The second category, spatial scale, was further subdivided into five scale dependent factors (i) pixel size, (ii) minimum mappable unit, (iii) smoothing, (iv) thematic resolution and (v) extent. We reviewed all articles published in the journal Landscape ecology in 2007 and recorded how spatial data was used and whether spatial uncertainty was addressed or reported in ecological analyses. This review found that spatial uncertainty was rarely addressed and/or reported.
Subject Landscape Ecology
Keyword(s) Classification error
Land-cover mapping
Landscape pattern
Remote sensing
Spatial uncertainty
DOI - identifier 10.1007/s10980-012-9791-7
Copyright notice © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
ISSN 0921-2973
Additional Notes This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Landscape Ecology. The final authenticated version is available online at:
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 50 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 40 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 186 Abstract Views, 67 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 15 Apr 2013, 12:04:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us