Beyond advocacy: making space for conservation scientists in public debate

Garrard, G, Fidler, F, Wintle, B, Chee, Y and Bekessy, S 2016, 'Beyond advocacy: making space for conservation scientists in public debate', Conservation Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 208-212.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006055687.pdf Published Version application/pdf 204.40KB
Title Beyond advocacy: making space for conservation scientists in public debate
Author(s) Garrard, G
Fidler, F
Wintle, B
Chee, Y
Bekessy, S
Year 2016
Journal name Conservation Letters
Volume number 9
Issue number 3
Start page 208
End page 212
Total pages 5
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Abstract The topic of advocacy by scientists has been debated for decades, yet there is little agreement about whether scientists can or should be advocates. The fear of crossing a line into advocacy continues to hold many scientists back from contributing to public discourse, impoverishing public debate about important issues. We believe that progress in this debate is limited by a misconception about the relationship between scientific integrity and objectivity. We begin by unpacking this relationship and debunking three common misconceptions about advocacy by scientists: namely, that advocacy is harmful to scientific credibility, beyond the scope of science, and incompatible with science, which is value-free. We propose new ways of thinking about responsible advocacy by conservation scientists, drawing on practices from the health sciences, where researchers and professional bodies are empowered to act as health advocates.In so doing, we hope to open further space for conservation scientists to actively and legitimately engage in public debate about conservation issues.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
History and Philosophy of Science (incl. Non-historical Philosophy of Science)
Keyword(s) Biodiversity
Implementation science
Knowledge brokerage
Objectivity
Policy
Scientific communication
Values
DOI - identifier 10.1111/conl.12193
Copyright notice © 2015 The Authors Conservation Letters Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN 1755-263X
Additional Notes Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 172 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 04 Nov 2015, 07:37:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us