A standardised tool for assessing needs in forensic psychiatric population: Clinical validation of the Italian CANFOR, staff version

Castelletti, L, Lasalvia, A, Molinari, E, Thomas, S, Straticò, E and Bonetto, C 2015, 'A standardised tool for assessing needs in forensic psychiatric population: Clinical validation of the Italian CANFOR, staff version', Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 274-281.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title A standardised tool for assessing needs in forensic psychiatric population: Clinical validation of the Italian CANFOR, staff version
Author(s) Castelletti, L
Lasalvia, A
Molinari, E
Thomas, S
Straticò, E
Bonetto, C
Year 2015
Journal name Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Volume number 24
Issue number 3
Start page 274
End page 281
Total pages 8
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Abstract Abstract BACKGROUND: The Camberwell Assessment of Need - Forensic Version (CANFOR) is a standardised assessment tool specifically designed to assess needs for care in forensic psychiatric populations. The original English version of the instrument has shown good psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the CANFOR-staff tool. METHOD: After translation and back-translation, the Italian CANFOR tool was administered to a sample of 50 forensic psychiatric patients. Convergent validity was tested using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) by applying Kendall's tau-b. Inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities were measured by ICCs for need dimensions (total and unmet) and Cohen's kappa coefficients for individual need items. RESULTS: Regarding convergent validity, a higher number of needs (total and unmet) were associated with more severe psychiatric symptoms (BPRS). Higher numbers of unmet needs were also associated with lower levels of global functioning (GAF). ICCs for total and unmet needs scores indicated a good level of agreement for inter-rater reliability and a very good level for test-retest, respectively. Regarding the specific items, inter-rater Cohen's kappa was high (moderate to very good agreement) for 18 items in relation to the presence of a need and for 15 items in the rating of an unmet need, whereas Cohen's kappa for test-retest reliability was very high for all the items in the presence of a need and high for 18 of the unmet need domains. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of CANFOR has adequate psychometric properties. It can be considered a promising instrument for the assessment of needs of forensic psychiatric patients.
Subject Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Criminology not elsewhere classified
Psychology not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) Diagnostic techniques and procedures
Forensic psychiatry
Functional assessment
Validation studies
DOI - identifier 10.1017/S2045796014000602
Copyright notice © Cambridge University Press 2014
ISSN 2045-7960
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 105 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 17 Nov 2015, 10:21:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us