Interactions between biodiversity offsets and protected area commitments: Avoiding perverse outcomes

Maron, M, Gordon, A, Mackey, B, Possingham, H and Watson, J 2016, 'Interactions between biodiversity offsets and protected area commitments: Avoiding perverse outcomes', Conservation Letters, pp. 1-6.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Interactions between biodiversity offsets and protected area commitments: Avoiding perverse outcomes
Author(s) Maron, M
Gordon, A
Mackey, B
Possingham, H
Watson, J
Year 2016
Journal name Conservation Letters
Start page 1
End page 6
Total pages 6
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Abstract Economic growth is often in conflict with environmental goals. Biodiversity offsetting attempts to resolve this conflict by requiring industries to compensate for the biodiversity loss they cause, by generating an equivalent biodiversity gain elsewhere. Offsets for environmental impacts are increasingly being seen as a way to help meet preexisting conservation targets, such as those relating to the establishment and management of protected areas. We examine how using offsets to meet a state or organization's genuine commitments, which are not contingent on the offsets, results in no additional conservation benefit. In this case, either the offset or the preexisting commitment is invalid. For example, the use of offsets to meet commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity requires an admission that those commitments would otherwise not be met. This interaction between international agreements around protected areas and offset policy can generate perverse incentives, which must be carefully managed to avoid poor conservation outcomes. We propose separate accounting for conservation gains generated using offsets, and that future conservation agreements and targets should explicitly separate commitments met using offset gains from those which are not reliant on equivalent losses.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Environment Policy
Keyword(s) Additionality
Aichi targets
Biodiversity offsets
Convention on biological diversity
Perverse outcomes
Protected areas
Transparent accounting
DOI - identifier 10.1111/conl.12222
Copyright notice © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN 1755-263X
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 13 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 107 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 14 Apr 2016, 11:04:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us