Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement

Kusmanoff, A, Hardy, M, Fidler, F, Maffey, G, Raymond, C, Reed, M, Fitzsimons, J and Bekessy, S 2016, 'Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement', Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 61, pp. 124-128.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006060646.pdf Accepted Manuscript application/pdf 430.73KB
Title Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement
Author(s) Kusmanoff, A
Hardy, M
Fidler, F
Maffey, G
Raymond, C
Reed, M
Fitzsimons, J
Bekessy, S
Year 2016
Journal name Environmental Science and Policy
Volume number 61
Start page 124
End page 128
Total pages 5
Publisher Elsevier
Abstract How conservation messages are framed will likely impact on the success of our efforts to engage people in conservation action. This is highly relevant in the private land conservation (PLC) sector given the low participation rates of landholders. Using a case study of PLC schemes targeted at Australian landholders, we present the first systematic analysis of communication strategies used by organisations and government departments delivering those schemes to engage the public. We develop a novel approach for analysing the framing of conservation messages that codes the stated benefits of schemes according to value orientation. We categorised the benefits as flowing to either the landholder, to society, or to the environment, corresponding to the egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations that have been shown to influence human behaviour. We find that messages are biased towards environmental benefits. Surprisingly, this is the case even for market-based schemes that have the explicit objective of appealing to production-focussed landholders and those who are not already involved in conservation. The risk is that PLC schemes framed in this way will fail to engage more egoistically oriented landholders and are only likely to appeal to those most likely to already be conservation-minded. By understanding the frame in which PLC benefits are communicated, we can begin to understand the types of people who may be engaged by these messages, and who may not be. Results suggest that the framing of the communications for many schemes could be broadened to appeal to a more diverse group (and thus ultimately to a larger group) of landholders.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Environmental Management
Environmental Sociology
Keyword(s) Framing
value orientation
biodiversity
conservation
DOI - identifier 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.016
Copyright notice © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
ISSN 1462-9011
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 12 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 149 Abstract Views, 65 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 05 May 2016, 08:54:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us