What happened, how, why and what mattered: Three case studies from a low income residential energy efficiency intervention program

Willand, N 2016, 'What happened, how, why and what mattered: Three case studies from a low income residential energy efficiency intervention program', in Heatlhy Housing 2016: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Energy and Environment of Residential Buildings, Brisbane, Australia, 20-24 November 2016, pp. 461-470.


Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: Conference Papers

Title What happened, how, why and what mattered: Three case studies from a low income residential energy efficiency intervention program
Author(s) Willand, N
Year 2016
Conference name Heatlhy Housing 2016: 7th International Conference on Energy and Environment of Residential Buildings
Conference location Brisbane, Australia
Conference dates 20-24 November 2016
Proceedings title Heatlhy Housing 2016: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Energy and Environment of Residential Buildings
Publisher Queensland University of Technology
Place of publication Australia
Start page 461
End page 470
Total pages 10
Abstract In the context of residential retrofit programs as an opportunity for climate change mitigation and health, the mechanisms that lead to unexpected outcomes in indoor temperature and energy consumption are not well understood. Paradoxical and surprising findings have been attributed to householder behaviour. Better knowledge of householder practices is needed for more effective designs of interventions. This paper draws on a mixed methods study of an energy retrofit program for the homes of low-income, elderly or frail householders in Victoria, Australia. A quantitative exploration was combined with a phenomenological enquiry to explain the outcomes in warmth, heating energy consumption and householder satisfaction through householder practices and experiences. This paper details three retrofit case studies that illustrated the diversity of outcomes, the take-back, the prebound and the expected effects. These cases highlighted how the interaction of the material quality of the home, householder capabilities and the meaning of heating shaped the changes in warmth and energy consumption. The householders' evaluations of the intervention program highlighted that 'what mattered' was not necessarily the impact of the retrofit. While the effects discussed here are not new and the results lack generalisability, these case studies demonstrate that the theoretical predictions and the interpretation of the outcomes should be sensitive to contextual determinants. Interventions should include pre-study safety checks and aim for high thermal performance to be effective. Intervention studies should include a control group to assess confounding variables and bias. By identifying some contextual mechanisms that may enhance or hinder benefits in indoor temperatures and energy conservation, this study helps to better understand the effectiveness of residential energy efficiency interventions.
Subjects Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) Indoor temperature
intervention
prebound
take back
practices
DOI - identifier 10.4225/50/581078f9d2990
Versions
Version Filter Type
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 105 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 20 Dec 2016, 10:05:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us