Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation

Selinske, M, Cooke, B, Torabi, N, Hardy, M, Knight, A and Bekessy, S 2016, 'Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation', Ecology and Society, vol. 22, no. 2, 7, pp. 1-10.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006073009.pdf Published Version application/pdf 138.41KB
Title Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation
Author(s) Selinske, M
Cooke, B
Torabi, N
Hardy, M
Knight, A
Bekessy, S
Year 2016
Journal name Ecology and Society
Volume number 22
Issue number 2
Article Number 7
Start page 1
End page 10
Total pages 10
Publisher Resilience Alliance Publications
Abstract A variety of policy instruments are used to promote the conservation of biodiversity on private land. These instruments are often employed in unison to encourage land stewardship beneficial for biodiversity across a broad range of program types, but questions remain about which instruments are the appropriate tools when seeking long-term change to land-management practice. Drawing on three case studies, two in Australia and one in South Africa, spanning various program types-a biodiverse carbon planting scheme, a covenanting program, and a voluntary stewardship program-we investigate the importance of financial incentives and other mechanisms from the landholder's perspective. From participant interviews we find that landholders have preconceived notions of stewardship ethics. Motivations to enroll into a private land conservation program are not necessarily what drives ongoing participation, and continued delivery of multiple mechanisms will likely ensure long-term landholder engagement. Financial incentives are beneficial in lowering uptake costs to landholders but building landholder capacity, management assistance, linking participants to a network of conservation landholders, and recognition of conservation efforts may be more successful in fostering long-term biodiversity stewardship. Furthermore, we argue that diverse, multiple instrument approaches are needed to provide the flexibility required for dynamic, adaptive policy responses. We raise a number of key considerations for conservation organizations regarding the appropriate mix of financial and nonfinancial components of their programs to address long-term conservation objectives.
Subject Environmental Management
Social and Cultural Geography
Human Geography not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) biodiversity
covenant
easement
farmer engagement
market-based instrument
policy mix
program design
reverse auction
stewardship
DOI - identifier 10.5751/ES-09148-220207
Copyright notice Copyright © 2017 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.
ISSN 1708-3087
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 122 Abstract Views, 37 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 03 May 2017, 08:06:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us