Decline of 'biodiversity' in conservation policy discourse in Australia

Kusmanoff, A, Fidler, F, Gordon, A and Bekessy, S 2017, 'Decline of 'biodiversity' in conservation policy discourse in Australia', Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 77, pp. 160-165.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006078085.pdf Published Version application/pdf 835.49KB
Title Decline of 'biodiversity' in conservation policy discourse in Australia
Author(s) Kusmanoff, A
Fidler, F
Gordon, A
Bekessy, S
Year 2017
Journal name Environmental Science and Policy
Volume number 77
Start page 160
End page 165
Total pages 6
Publisher Elsevier
Abstract Market-based instruments along with conceptualizing the environment as a collection of 'ecosystem services' has become increasingly common within environmental and conservation policy. This kind of thinking is also increasingly prominent in the public discourse surrounding environment and conservation policy, particularly in the context of communicating the importance of policy measures. Language used in public discourse can have a powerful influence on how people engage with policy issues, and changes within the biodiversity and conservation discourse may have consequences for public engagement in conservation. We explored how these factors are changing with time by documenting the use of the terms 'bio' and the prevalence of economic language in the text of 3553 media releases between 2003 and 2014 from the Australian Government environment portfolio, and 1064 media releases from the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF). Results show that in the last decade, the term 'biodiversity' has become less prevalent whilst economic language has increased in both Australian Government and ACF communication. A further content analysis in a subsample of 745 media releases explored the prevalence of ecosystem services framing, results indicating that it has become a mainstream concept. While this may reflect a strategic response by these agencies to better engage with both the general public and decision makers within what is an increasingly dominant neoliberal paradigm, we argue it may also have unintended (possibly adverse) impacts on how people think about and engage with biodiversity conservation.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Keyword(s) Framing
Public policy
Environment policy
DOI - identifier 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.016
Copyright notice © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND /BY-NC-ND/4.0/
ISSN 1462-9011
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 169 Abstract Views, 33 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 20 Sep 2017, 10:22:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us