Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation

Cooke, B and Corbo-Perkins, G 2018, 'Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation', Land Use Policy, vol. 70, pp. 172-181.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006079730.pdf Submitted Version application/pdf 842.37KB
Title Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation
Author(s) Cooke, B
Corbo-Perkins, G
Year 2018
Journal name Land Use Policy
Volume number 70
Start page 172
End page 181
Total pages 10
Publisher Pergamon Press
Abstract The increasing popularity of private land conservation (PLC) globally has quickly translated into an array of polices and programs aimed at achieving ecological benefits. The growth of PLC is entwined with the rise of neoliberal governance, with private land proving congruous with the promotion of market-based instruments (MBIs) and the reliance on private protected areas for conservation in lieu of government investment in public lands. Despite a growing literature on the implications of neoliberal environmental governance, there remains a need for specific insights into the way that individual landholders and ecologies can co-opt or resist the rationalities of MBIs in the practice of private land conservation. Through semi-structured interviews and property walks with 18 landholders, this research examines the implementation of a reverse-auction tender scheme called 'EcoTender' in Victoria, Australia. We uncovered four main tensions between the market logic of the program and conservation practice: 1) some landholders used the payment scheme to increase regulatory protections on their property through covenants/easements; 2) many landholders struggled to conceive of their stewardship practice as contractual labour; 3) landholders were producing novel ecosystems that challenged land management focused at the property parcel scale when EcoTender encouraged a return to historical benchmark ecologies, and; 4) many landholders wanted social collaboration when the program required competition for cost efficiency. Our insights show that PLC must create room for a diverse trajectory of conservation practice in dynamic socio-ecological contexts. This means careful reflection on the validity of assumptions underpinning MBIs, the trade-offs that come with applying market logic to conservation and the long-term implications of these instruments for policy and practice.
Subject Social and Cultural Geography
Environmental Management
Human Geography not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) Environmental governance
Market-based instruments
Novel ecosystems
Payments for ecosystem services
Reverse auction
DOI - identifier 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.027
Copyright notice © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
ISSN 0264-8377
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 7 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 135 Abstract Views, 62 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 04 Dec 2017, 13:18:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us