Indigenous people and the miserable failure of Australian planning

Porter, L 2017, 'Indigenous people and the miserable failure of Australian planning', Planning Practice and Research, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 556-570.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2006073241.pdf Accepted Manuscript application/pdf 207.41KB
Title Indigenous people and the miserable failure of Australian planning
Author(s) Porter, L
Year 2017
Journal name Planning Practice and Research
Volume number 32
Issue number 5
Start page 556
End page 570
Total pages 15
Publisher Routledge
Abstract Major changes in Australian law and significant research efforts have re-positioned Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as important actors in planning. Yet, this has barely penetrated the consciousness of the mainstream professional community. Current requirements for professional competencies and planning curricula fall well short of preparing planners to productively engage with Indigenous people. The profession itself barely acknowledges the significant changes advanced in Indigenous studies and planning, and the new imperatives. This paper details the contemporary position of planning practice in Australia with regard to Indigenous people and considers the changes required to more justly engage with Indigenous rights.
Subject History and Theory of the Built Environment (excl. Architecture)
Urban and Regional Planning not elsewhere classified
Studies of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Society
Keyword(s) Australian planning
Indigenous people
land rights
DOI - identifier 10.1080/02697459.2017.1286885
Copyright notice © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN 0269-7459
Additional Notes This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Planning Practice and Research in 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02697459.2017.1286885
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 3 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 47 Abstract Views, 22 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 19 Sep 2018, 13:27:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us