A disability aware approach to torture prevention? Australian OPCAT ratification and improved protections for people with disability

Lea, M, Beaupert, F, Bevan, N, Celermajer, D, Gooding, P, Minty, R, Phillips, E, Spivakovsky, C, Steele, L, Wadiwel, D and Weller, P 2018, 'A disability aware approach to torture prevention? Australian OPCAT ratification and improved protections for people with disability', Australian Journal of Human Rights, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 70-96.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title A disability aware approach to torture prevention? Australian OPCAT ratification and improved protections for people with disability
Author(s) Lea, M
Beaupert, F
Bevan, N
Celermajer, D
Gooding, P
Minty, R
Phillips, E
Spivakovsky, C
Steele, L
Wadiwel, D
Weller, P
Year 2018
Journal name Australian Journal of Human Rights
Volume number 24
Issue number 1
Start page 70
End page 96
Total pages 27
Publisher Taylor & Francis Australasia
Abstract In 2017, Australia ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). Ratification of OPCAT presents a. unique opportunity to highlight the institutional treatment of people with disability i. range of sites of detention within Australia and build on advancing international protections for people with disability, including those articulated in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). This article considers the opportunity presented by OPCAT for improving protections for people with disability against torture and ill-treatment. The article argues for an expansive definition of sites of detention that is able to encapsulate both disability-specific and mainstream settings in which people with disability may be deprived of their liberty, as well as to address specific practices such as the use of mechanical restraint, chemical restraint and seclusion. Based on an analysis of international National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) models, it is further argued that people with disability, their representative bodies and other civil society actors must be meaningfully involved in NPM processes, including in the monitoring of sites of detention, and the identification of systemic issues affecting people with disability with lived experience of detention.
Subject Law and Society
Keyword(s) Australia
detention
disability
ill-treatment
OPCAT
torture
DOI - identifier 10.1080/1323238X.2018.1441611
Copyright notice © 2018 Australian Journal of Human Rights.
ISSN 1323-238X
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 2 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 23 Oct 2018, 16:00:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us