Fairness and transparency are required for the inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in publicly accessible conservation databases

Clements, H, Selinske, M, Archibald, C, Cooke, B, Fitzsimons, J, Groce, J, Torabi, N and Hardy, M 2018, 'Fairness and transparency are required for the inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in publicly accessible conservation databases', Land, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-13.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Fairness and transparency are required for the inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in publicly accessible conservation databases
Author(s) Clements, H
Selinske, M
Archibald, C
Cooke, B
Fitzsimons, J
Groce, J
Torabi, N
Hardy, M
Year 2018
Journal name Land
Volume number 7
Issue number 3
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Publisher MDPI
Abstract There is a growing recognition of the contribution that privately-owned land makes to conservation efforts, and governments are increasingly counting privately protected areas (PPAs) towards their international conservation commitments. The public availability of spatial data on countries' conservation estates is important for broad-scale conservation planning and monitoring and for evaluating progress towards targets. Yet there has been limited consideration of how PPA data is reported to national and international protected area databases, particularly whether such reporting is transparent and fair (i.e., equitable) to the landholders involved. Here we consider PPA reporting procedures from three countries with high numbers of PPAs-Australia, South Africa, and the United States-illustrating the diversity within and between countries regarding what data is reported and the transparency with which it is reported. Noting a potential tension between landholder preferences for privacy and security of their property information and the benefit of sharing this information for broader conservation efforts, we identify the need to consider equity in PPA reporting processes. Unpacking potential considerations and tensions into distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions of equity, we propose a series of broad principles to foster transparent and fair reporting. Our approach for navigating the complexity and context-dependency of equity considerations will help strengthen PPA reporting and facilitate the transparent integration of PPAs into broader conservation efforts.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Land Use and Environmental Planning
Environment Policy
Keyword(s) Convention on Biological Diversity
Aichi Target 11
conservation planning
protected area reporting
equity framework
private land conservation
privacy
DOI - identifier 10.3390/land7030096
Copyright notice © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
ISSN 2073-445X
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 13 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 06 Dec 2018, 10:39:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us