Spatial characteristics of species distributions as drivers in conservation prioritization

Kujalah, H, Moilanen, A and Gordon, A 2018, 'Spatial characteristics of species distributions as drivers in conservation prioritization', Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1121-1132.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Spatial characteristics of species distributions as drivers in conservation prioritization
Author(s) Kujalah, H
Moilanen, A
Gordon, A
Year 2018
Journal name Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume number 9
Issue number 4
Start page 1121
End page 1132
Total pages 12
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Abstract Spatial prioritization, based on the biogeographical identification of priority areas for conservation actions, is an important aspect of conservation planning. Although the influence of factors such as costs, threats or use of surrogates on the resulting priorities has been studied extensively, relatively little is known about how the spatial characteristics of species distributions drive the spatial pattern of priorities in multi-species conservation plans. Using datasets from Australia and Finland, we explore how excluding or including a given species changes spatial priorities in a multi-species prioritization. We develop three metrics to quantify changes in priorities, and explore how these changes depend on the total number of species used in the prioritization, the spatial characteristics of the given species distribution, and how species share their space with other species used in the prioritization. We randomly selected 12 set of 10 species from each dataset, and explore the influence of each of these species in prioritizations done for a total of 10, 20, 50 or 100 species. We show that spatial priorities become increasingly stable as the number of species is increased, and that the stability of highest and lowest priority areas behave differently. When less than 50 species were used in a prioritization, intermediately rare species that occupy mostly species-poor habitats tend to have the greatest influence on priorities, whereas very rare and common species that co-occur with many other species tend to have a small influence. Our results present a systematic method to explore the stability of spatial priorities to changes in the species pool used for a conservation plan. Although the analysed two datasets differed in data type, location, scale and species composition, they both showed how using a small number of species leads to unstable spatial solutions, where the choice to include or exclude an individual species can strongly influence the conservation
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Environmental Management
Keyword(s) conservation trade-offs
spatial conservation prioritization
spatial prioritization
species characteristics
species distribution
systematic conservation planning
DOI - identifier 10.1111/2041-210X.12939
Copyright notice © 2017 The Authors
ISSN 2041-210X
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 12 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 14 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Dec 2018, 16:06:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us