Integrating diverse social and ecological motivations to achieve landscape restoration

Jellinek, S, Wilson, K, Hagger, V, Mumaw, L, Cooke, B, Guerrero, A, Erickson, T, Zamin, T, Waryszak, P and Standish, R 2019, 'Integrating diverse social and ecological motivations to achieve landscape restoration', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 56, pp. 246-252.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Integrating diverse social and ecological motivations to achieve landscape restoration
Author(s) Jellinek, S
Wilson, K
Hagger, V
Mumaw, L
Cooke, B
Guerrero, A
Erickson, T
Zamin, T
Waryszak, P
Standish, R
Year 2019
Journal name Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume number 56
Start page 246
End page 252
Total pages 7
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract 1. Landscape‐scale restoration requires stakeholder collaboration and recognition of diverse social and ecological motivations to achieve multiple benefits. Yet few landscape restoration projects have set and achieved shared social and ecological goals. 2.Mechanisms to integrate social and ecological motivations will differ in different landscapes. We provide examples from urban, agricultural, and mined landscapes to highlight how integration can achieve multiple benefits and help incentivize restoration. 3.Better communication of ecological and especially social benefits of restoration could increase motivation. Social and economic incentives from carbon markets are evident in agricultural landscapes, biodiversity offset schemes are unlikely to motivate restoration without proof‐of‐concept, and framing restoration in terms of ecosystem services shows promise. 4.Synthesis and applications. When setting restoration goals, it is important to recognize the diverse motivations that influence them. In doing so, and by evaluating both social and ecological benefits, we can better achieve desired restoration outcomes. Customizing incentives to cater for diverse stakeholder motivations could therefore encourage restoration projects.
Subject Environmental Rehabilitation (excl. Bioremediation)
Keyword(s) biodiversity offset scheme
ecosystem services
mine restoration
old-field restoration
restoration incentives
socioecological
stakeholder engagement
urban restoration
DOI - identifier 10.1111/1365-2664.13248
Copyright notice © 2018 The Authors, Journal of Applied Ecology, British Ecological Society
ISSN 0021-8901
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 18 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 29 Apr 2019, 13:04:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us