Is peer review in academic publishing still working?

Jackson, L, Peters, M, Benade, L and Grierson, E., et al, 2018, 'Is peer review in academic publishing still working?', Open Review of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 95-112.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Is peer review in academic publishing still working?
Author(s) Jackson, L
Peters, M
Benade, L
Grierson, E., et al,
Year 2018
Journal name Open Review of Educational Research
Volume number 5
Issue number 1
Start page 95
End page 112
Total pages 18
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Abstract Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. This paper, produced by the Editors� Collective, examines the past and future of peer review in academic publishing. The first sections consider how peer review has been defined and practised in changing academic contexts, and its educational significance in the development of scholarship. The paper then explores major historical and contemporary issues around identity, diversity, anonymity, and the review process, and the related power of editors versus reviewers in academic publishing. Finally, the paper discusses the case of new scholars as reviewers engaging in neoliberal labour, before concluding with some brief recommendations based on our analysis.
Subject Education not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) academic publishing
higher education
Peer review
DOI - identifier 10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
Copyright notice © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ISSN 2326-5507
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 18 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 23 May 2019, 08:44:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us