Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction

Blismas, N, Pasquire, C and Gibb, A 2006, 'Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction', Construction Management and Economics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 121-130.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction
Author(s) Blismas, N
Pasquire, C
Gibb, A
Year 2006
Journal name Construction Management and Economics
Volume number 24
Issue number 2
Start page 121
End page 130
Total pages 10
Publisher Routledge
Abstract Evaluating to what extent a component or building system should be produced off-site is inadequate within the industry. The potential benefits of off-site production (OSP) are commonly cited when justifying an OSP approach, yet holistic and methodical assessments of the applicability and overall benefit of these solutions, to a particular project, have been found to be deficient. Common methods of evaluation simply take material, labour and transportation costs into account when comparing various options, often disregarding other cost-related items such as site facilities, crane use and rectification of works. These cost factors are usually buried within the nebulous preliminaries figure, with little reference to the building approach taken. Further, softer issues such as health and safety, effects on management and process benefits are either implicit or disregarded within these comparison exercises. Yet it is demonstrated that these issues are some of the most significant benefits of OSP. A series of case studies demonstrated that evaluation focus is almost solely on direct material and labour costs of components, without explicit regard for the wider cost or soft issue implications of OSP on a project. The paper argues that until evaluation is more holistic and value-based rather than cost-based, OSP uptake in construction will be slow.
Subject Building Construction Management and Project Planning
Keyword(s) benefits
off site
DOI - identifier 10.1080/01446190500184444
Copyright notice © 2006 Taylor & Francis.
ISSN 0144-6193
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 108 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 477 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 06 Dec 2010, 11:15:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us