The High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Item generation.

Williams, G, Robertson, V, Greenwood, K, Goldie, P and Morris, M 2005, 'The High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Item generation.', Brain Injury, vol. 19, pp. 925-932.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title The High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Item generation.
Author(s) Williams, G
Robertson, V
Greenwood, K
Goldie, P
Morris, M
Year 2005
Journal name Brain Injury
Volume number 19
Start page 925
End page 932
Total pages 8
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Abstract Primary objective: To generate a comprehensive list of items for a scale suitable for assessing high-level mobility in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research design: High-level mobility items were generated following a critical evaluation of existing adult and paediatric mobility scales and by surveying expert clinicians for opinions about items appropriate for inclusion on a high-level mobility scale. Main outcomes and results: The critical evaluation identified 18 different items from 31 mobility scales. These included nine walking items in addition to higher level activities such as stair use, running, jumping and hopping. Expert clinicians generated 157 items that were collated and condensed to 88 items for ranking on a questionnaire. Fifteen items on the questionnaire were rated as very important by 80% of the expert clinicians. These included walking forwards, walking on slopes and different surfaces, changing direction, walking long distances and stair use. Running items included forwards, backwards, on slopes and over different surfaces, changing direction, stopping and starting as well as running long distances. Balancing in single limb stance was also included. Conclusion: The final list comprised walking, running, hopping, skipping, jumping and balance items. This initial version of the HiMAT has face and content validity although requires further testing to investigate whether it is uni-dimensional and valid for people with TBI.
Subject Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Cognitive Science not elsewhere classified
DOI - identifier 10.1080/02699050500058687
ISSN 0269-9052
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 35 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 151 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 06 Dec 2010, 11:15:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us