A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: Implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance

Harvey, E, Fletcher, D, Shortis, M and Kendrick, G 2004, 'A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: Implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance', Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 55, pp. 573-580.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size
n2004002415.pdf Accepted Manuscript application/pdf 285.83KB
Title A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: Implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance
Author(s) Harvey, E
Fletcher, D
Shortis, M
Kendrick, G
Year 2004
Journal name Marine and Freshwater Research
Volume number 55
Start page 573
End page 580
Total pages 7
Publisher CSIRO Publishing
Abstract Underwater visual census of reef fish by scuba divers is a widely used and useful technique for assessing the composition and abundance of reef fish assemblages, but suffers from several biases and errors. We compare the accuracy of underwater visual estimates of distance made by novice and experienced scientific divers and an underwater stereo-video system. We demonstrate the potential implications that distance errors may have on underwater visual census assessments of reef fish abundance. We also investigate how the accuracy and precision of scuba diver length estimates of fish is affected as distance increases. Distance was underestimated by both experienced ( mean relative error = -11.7%, s.d. = 21.4%) and novice scientific divers (mean relative error = -5.0%, s. d. =17.9%). For experienced scientific divers this error may potentially result in an 82% underestimate or 194% overestimate of the actual area censused, which will affect estimates of fish density. The stereo-video system also underestimated distance but to a much lesser degree (mean relative error = -0.9%, s.d. = 2.6%) and with less variability than the divers. There was no correlation between the relative error of length estimates and the distance of the fish away from the observer.
Subject Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Keyword(s) accuracy
bias
precision
sampling error
DOI - identifier 10.1071/mf03130
Copyright notice © CSIRO 2004
ISSN 1323-1650
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 109 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 308 Abstract Views, 2208 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 18 Feb 2009, 09:53:18 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us