The integration of complementary therapies in Australian general practice: Results of a national survey

Cohen, M, Penman, S, Pirotta, M and Da Costa, C 2005, 'The integration of complementary therapies in Australian general practice: Results of a national survey', Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 995-1004.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title The integration of complementary therapies in Australian general practice: Results of a national survey
Author(s) Cohen, M
Penman, S
Pirotta, M
Da Costa, C
Year 2005
Journal name Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume number 11
Start page 995
End page 1004
Total pages 10
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Abstract Australian general practitioners' (GPs) attitudes toward and use of a range of complementary therapies (CTs) were determined through a self-administered postal survey sent to a random sample of 2000 Australian GPs. The survey canvassed GPs' opinions as to the harmfulness and effectiveness of CTs; current levels of training and interest in further training; personal use of, and use in practice of, CTs; referrals to CT; practitioners; appropriateness for GPs to practice and for government regulation; perceived patient demand and the need for undergraduate education. Results: The response rate was 33.2%. Based on GPs' responses, complementary therapies could be classified into: nonmedicinal and nonmanipulative therapies, such as acupuncture, massage, meditation, yoga, and hypnosis, that were seen to be highly effective and safe; medicinal and manipulative therapies, including chiropractic, Chinese herbal medicine, osteopathy, herbal medicine, vitamin and mineral therapy, naturopathy, and homeopathy, which more GPs considered potentially harmful than potentially effective; and esoteric therapies, such as spiritual healing, aromatherapy, and reflexology, which were seen to be relatively safe yet also relatively ineffective. The risks of CTs were seen to mainly arise from incorrect, inadequate, or delayed diagnoses and interactions between complementary medications and pharmaceuticals, rather than the specific risks of the therapies themselves. Conclusions: Nonmedicinal therapies along with chiropractic are widely accepted in Australia and can be considered mainstream. GPs are open to training in complementary therapies, and better communication between patients and GPs about use of CTs is required to minimize the risk of adverse events. There is also a need to prioritize and provide funding for further research into the potential adverse events from these therapies and other therapies currently lacking an evidence base.
Subject Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) Complementary therapies
DOI - identifier 10.1089/acm.2005.11.995
Copyright notice © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
ISSN 1075-5535
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 93 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 107 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 148 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 07 Jan 2011, 09:11:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us