Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists

Bydder, S, Marion, K, TAYLOR, M and SEMMENS, J 2006, 'Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists', Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 355-359.


Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
Author(s) Bydder, S
Marion, K
TAYLOR, M
SEMMENS, J
Year 2006
Journal name Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Volume number 50
Issue number 4
Start page 355
End page 359
Total pages 5
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Abstract The process for selecting abstracts submitted for presentation at annual scientific meetings should ensure both the quality of these meetings and fairness to prospective presenters. The aim of the present study was to review the assessment of radiation oncology abstracts submitted for oral presentation to the 2004 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists annual scientific meeting. Selection criteria were developed that were primarily focused on the subjective aspects of abstract quality. All research abstracts were reviewed blindly by five individual reviewers (four radiation oncologists and a statistician), scoring each abstract in five categories. The scores of three reviewers were used to select the top 30 general and top eight trainee entries. For comparison, cluster analysis using the scores of all five reviewers was used to group papers into two ranks. There was a strong correlation in total scores for each paper, between all reviewers. Similarly, the study design subscale was strongly correlated between all reviewers. Abstracts belonging to the first-rank cluster were generally selected. Most trainee entries would have been successful in being accepted into the general programme. The selection process described appears feasible and fair and may improve the quality of meetings.
Subject Operations Research
Keyword(s) Abstract to publication ratio
Cluster analysis
Quality assurance
Scientific meetings
DOI - identifier 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01599.x
Copyright notice © 2006 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
ISSN 1754-9485
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 110 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 19 Feb 2013, 13:10:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us