A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom

Lye, J, Kenny, J, Lehmann, J, Dunn, L, Kron, T, Alves, A, Cole, A and Williams, I 2014, 'A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom', Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 10, 101712, pp. 1-11.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom
Author(s) Lye, J
Kenny, J
Lehmann, J
Dunn, L
Kron, T
Alves, A
Cole, A
Williams, I
Year 2014
Journal name Medical Physics
Volume number 41
Issue number 10
Article Number 101712
Start page 1
End page 11
Total pages 11
Publisher American Institute of Physics
Abstract Purpose: The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit. Methods: The ACDS Level II audit measures the dose delivered in 2D planes using an ionization chamber based array positioned at multiple depths. Measurements are made in rectilinear homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms composed of slabs of solid water and lung. Computer generated computed tomography data sets of the rectilinear phantoms are supplied to the facility prior to audit for planning of a range of cases including reference fields, asymmetric fields, and wedged fields. The audit assesses 3D planning with 6 MV photons with a static (zero degree) gantry. Scoring is performed using local dose differences between the planned and measured dose within 80% of the field width. The overall audit result is determined by the maximum dose difference over all scoring points, cases, and planes. Pass (Optimal Level) is defined as maximum dose difference ≤3.3%, Pass (Action Level) is ≤5.0%, and Fail (Out of Tolerance) is >5.0%. Results: At close of 2013, the ACDS had performed 24 Level II audits. 63% of the audits passed, 33% failed, and the remaining audit was not assessable. Of the 15 audits that passed, 3 were at Pass (Action Level). The high fail rate is largely due to a systemic issue with modeling asymmetric 60° wedges which caused a delivered overdose of 5%–8%. Conclusions: The ACDS has implemented a nonreference condition Level II type audit, based on ion chamber 2D array measurements in an inhomogeneous slab phantom. The powerful diagnostic ability of this audit has allowed the ACDS to rigorously test the treatment planning systems implemented in Australian radiotherapy facilities. Recommendations from audits have led to facilities modifying clinical practice and changing planning protocols.
Subject Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) audit
DOI - identifier 10.1118/1.4896097
Copyright notice © 2014 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med.
ISSN 0094-2405
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 12 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 224 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 23 Jun 2015, 11:04:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us