Capturing residents' values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice

Ives, C, Oke, C, Hehir, A, Gordon, A, Wang, Y and Bekessy, S 2017, 'Capturing residents' values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice', Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 161, pp. 32-43.

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Journal Articles

Title Capturing residents' values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice
Author(s) Ives, C
Oke, C
Hehir, A
Gordon, A
Wang, Y
Bekessy, S
Year 2017
Journal name Landscape and Urban Planning
Volume number 161
Start page 32
End page 43
Total pages 12
Publisher Elsevier
Abstract Planning for green space is guided by standards and guidelines but there is currently little understanding of the variety of values people assign to green spaces or their determinants. Land use planners need to know what values are associated with different landscape characteristics and how value elicitation techniques can inform decisions. We designed a Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) study and surveyed residents of four urbanising suburbs in the Lower Hunter region of NSW, Australia. Participants assigned dots on maps to indicate places they associated with a typology of values (specific attributes or functions considered important) and negative qualities related to green spaces. The marker points were digitised and aggregated according to discrete park polygons for statistical analysis. People assigned a variety of values to green spaces (such as aesthetic value or social interaction value), which were related to landscape characteristics. Some variables (e.g. distance to water) were statistically associated with multiple open space values. Distance from place of residence however did not strongly influence value assignment after landscape configuration was accounted for. Value compatibility analysis revealed that some values co-occurred in park polygons more than others (e.g. nature value and health/therapeutic value). Results highlight the potential for PPGIS techniques to inform green space planning through the spatial representation of complex human-nature relationships. However, a number of potential pitfalls and challenges should be addressed. These include the non-random spatial arrangement of landscape features that can skew interpretation of results and the need to communicate clearly about theory that explains observed patterns.
Subject Conservation and Biodiversity
Landscape Ecology
Keyword(s) Biodiversity
Green space
Landscape values
Urban parks
Urban planning
DOI - identifier 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.010
Copyright notice © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN 0169-2046
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 30 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 242 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 23 May 2017, 07:46:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us