Changing demand: Flexibility of energy practices in households with children - Final Report

Nicholls, L and Strengers, Y 2015, Changing demand: Flexibility of energy practices in households with children - Final Report, Australian Policy Online, Melbourne, Australia

Document type: Commissioned Reports
Collection: Commissioned Reports

Title of report Changing demand: Flexibility of energy practices in households with children - Final Report
Author(s) Nicholls, L
Strengers, Y
Year of publication 2015
Publisher Australian Policy Online
Place of publication Melbourne, Australia
Subjects Social Change
Abstract/Summary This report summarises the findings and recommendations from the 'Changing Demand: Flexibility of energy practices in households with children' research project funded by the Consumer Advocacy Panel. The project aimed to understand how households with children may be affected by electricity market reforms and demand management initiatives, such as cost-reflective pricing. The study involved 44 in-depth interviews, home tours and observations and a national survey with over 500 Australian households with children. Overview In households with children, many of the practices which use energy are coordinated and concentrated in the late afternoon and early evening on weekdays. Parents' reliance on routine to manage the demands of family life limits the flexibility of energy use. With limited ability to shift practices to other times of the day, and priorities such as 'doing what's best for children' and 'using time efficiently' taking precedence, households with children risk financial disadvantage under pricing strategies such as Time-of-Use (TOU) pricing. Financial insecurity is widespread in, but not limited to, low-income and sole parent households. Health concerns, thermally inefficient housing and appliances, housing tenure, safety and noise concerns, and widespread tariff confusion also restrict the capacity of households with children to manage energy use and costs. Many parents had little time, interest or trust to investigate tariff choice and available energy information. As such, increasing choice and complexity in electricity market offerings does not meet the needs of these households and TOU pricing is unlikely to achieve its aims with this household group. Family routines were more amenable to disruption on an occasional basis for non-financial reasons. For example, 85 per cent of survey respondents said they would reduce electricity use for a 'peak alert' in hot weather.
Commissioning body Consumer Advocacy Panel
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 75 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 06 Dec 2018, 10:39:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us