A comparative study of Data-driven Prognostic Approaches: Stochastic and Statistical Models

Li, R, Verhagen, W and Curran, R 2018, 'A comparative study of Data-driven Prognostic Approaches: Stochastic and Statistical Models', in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM 2018), Seattle, United States, 11-13 June 2018, pp. 1-8.


Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: Conference Papers

Title A comparative study of Data-driven Prognostic Approaches: Stochastic and Statistical Models
Author(s) Li, R
Verhagen, W
Curran, R
Year 2018
Conference name ICPHM 2018
Conference location Seattle, United States
Conference dates 11-13 June 2018
Proceedings title Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM 2018)
Publisher IEEE
Place of publication United States
Start page 1
End page 8
Total pages 8
Abstract Prognostics and health management (PHM) has become a crucial component of many machines and engineering systems, enabling fault diagnostics, prognostics yielding remaining useful lifetime (RUL), and health management [1]. Research on how to predict RUL accurately has achieved popularity due to the accelerated development of prognostic techniques and algorithms [2]. In recent years, a considerable amount of research has been undertaken in data-driven prognostic approaches for RUL prediction, and various novel prediction techniques have been proposed in order to improve estimation accuracy. However, a systematic discussion and comparison of data-driven approaches and their contributing elements are lacking. While several reviews provide excellent overviews of RUL prediction methods, these are typically covered from a holistic perspective[3] [4]. The contributing process elements in prognostic methods, such as health indication construction, are typically not compared in detail. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a generic prognostic method breakdown with five contributing technical steps. In addition, case studies are implemented to compare the technical steps of health indicator (HI) construction, degradation model, and RUL prediction. This paper comprehensively compares the approaches, in a systematic manner, covering the proposed five technical steps, and evaluates the results using a consistent set of criteria. This research contributes towards formulating a decision framework to guide a PHM system designer towards selection of an appropriate prognostic approach.
Subjects Aerospace Engineering not elsewhere classified
Keyword(s) Prognostics and health management (PHM)
Data-driven method
Prognostic process
DOI - identifier 10.1109/ICPHM.2018.8448439
Copyright notice © 2018 European Union
ISBN 9781538611647
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Altmetric details:
Access Statistics: 9 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 21 Apr 2020, 07:34:00 EST by Catalyst Administrator
© 2014 RMIT Research Repository • Powered by Fez SoftwareContact us